You've heard the statistics - 9 out of 10 new restaurants close within the first year. But new research debunks the myth and spells out the reality. Find out what the true figures are, and more importantly, the key factors that make or break a restaurant's success.
There are a lot of misconceptions about restaurant failures. In 2003, NBC television network broadcast a program entitled Restaurant: A Reality Show. During the show, an advertisement by American Express claimed that "90% of restaurants fail during the first year of operation." Is that reality or a myth?
A new research study published in the Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly examined both restaurant failure rates and the reasons for failure. Rather than just look at bankruptcy statistics as did many past studies, the researchers examined 2,439 restaurant operating permits from the Columbus, Ohio, health department over a three-year period. This allowed the research to examine closures and ownership changes (considered as a failure in the study, although some of the restaurants may have been successful but sold by their owners for personal reasons), as permits had to be renewed each year and any change in ownership required a new permit.
The graph and chart below show the research findings for restaurant turnover rates:
Year 1 | Year 2 | Year | |
---|---|---|---|
All Restaurants | 26.2% | 45.4% | 59.7% |
Independent Restaurants | 25.5% | 45.1% | 59.4% |
Chain Restaurants | 24.1% | 42.7% | 57.2% |
During their first year of operation, slightly over 25% of all restaurants closed or changed ownership. By the end of their third year, just short of 60% of all restaurants closed or changed ownership. The turnover rate varied little between independent and chain restaurants
The study also examined restaurant turnover rates based upon the density of restaurants compared to population in different areas of the city. Restaurant turnover was highest in areas with higher concentrations of restaurants. In other words, the greater the number of restaurants for a given population, the greater the failure rate.
An analysis of various restaurant segments showed differences in turnover rates.
Mexican | 86.8% |
---|---|
Subs & bakeries | 76.7% |
Coffee & snacks | 70.0% |
Pizza | 61.2% |
Chicken | 57.9% |
Casual dining | 53.1% |
Asian | 51.4% |
Family dining | 45.0% |
Steak | 42.9% |
Buffers & cafeterias | 38.5% |
Italian | 35.3% |
Burgers | 33.7% |
Seafood | 33.3% |
The research not only examined quantitative data, but also conducted a qualitative study to determine reasons for both success and failure. Twenty independent full-service restaurant operators who had been in business for at least five years and 20 failed full-service restaurant operators were interviewed.
The key finding of the qualitative study was that a successful restaurant requires focus on a clear concept that drives all activities. Concept is different than strategy. Whether or not operators had elaborate strategic plans was not a determining factor for success, but clarity of concept was. Successful restaurant owners all had a well-defined concept that not only provided a food product also included an operating philosophy, which encompassed business operations as well as employee and customer relations. Failed restaurant owners, when asked about their concept, discussed only the food product. The researchers concluded it was obvious from the interviews that food quality does not guarantee success; the concept must be well defined beyond the type of food served.
The researchers summarized their findings on the many forces that impact restaurant success or failure. Although these findings are from interviews of restaurateurs, the findings are just as applicable to any location-based leisure concept, especially those incorporating food and entertainment.